Class talk:COM352 - Group Dynamics - Spring 2008/course outlines and in-class activities/fourth day of class
From UMassWiki
Contents |
Recognizing a Frame
- ~ following Erving Goffman, according to the mutually-constructed knowledge of the group-as-a-whole.
Background
Hypothesized Meaning
Projected Paths of Meaningfulness
gets "fixed" as the way things need to be, a
structure that can be relied upon because it is
familiar and therefore more 'safe,' as people
already have examples of 'what to do' and 'how to go on.'
- "Refers to value judgments as to 'what ought to be,' in contrast to positive which is about 'what is.'" (Glossary of International Economics, "N")
- "Pertaining to the average or expected behavior patterns of a group or community (Barker, 1995)." (Finding Health Measurement Tools)
- "Refers to a standard or set of norms that are understood as the correct (or at least the majority) way of interpreting the world in which we live." (Conflict and Community in the Corinthian Church)
Evidence of Social Interaction
Identifying Communicative Behaviors
We managed to list six specific things that people know "to do" in a small group activity in a classroom:
- Assume a decision must be made, there is a certain answer to be achieved.
- (Does anyone remember what we were talking about when I wrote this cryptic phrase?) :-/
- Actually create a definition (i.e., answer a given question).
- Ask Questions
- Do Research (looking in notes)
- Take Notes
Reframing
How do norms change? What happens when individuals, say "A" and "B" discover they have to work together to produce something, but they approach the task differently? Can frames be altered? How?



Was this article useful? Please spread the word and 
