Personal tools
Share This Page
Facebook
del.icio.us
StumbleUpon
Site Sponsors

Thanks to the COM352 students for contributing a bunch of new pages! I'll be moving these pages into the main area of the wiki soon.

Class:ENG112 - Section 36 - Fall 2007/new magazine page/Section 5

From UMassWiki

Jump to: navigation, search

Image:Nopunish.jpg

Every day when we turn on the television, we learn what is happening in our world. Living on the same planet does not mean that our fates are similar. Everyone has his/her own story—this is the meaning of destiny. In America, we enjoy watching basketball and baseball for entertainment. However, in Africa, people are suffering from inadequate or absent health care. Without a doubt, vigorous pleasure is difficult in countries of the third world. The papers in this category involve money. Blendi tells us, “AIDS is a time bomb to the world.” He is right. AIDS is an epidemic disaster which should concern everyone, but is there anyone in America who really cares about the victims in Africa? Will people continue to follow society’s fashion and spend huge amounts of money in supporting collegiate and professional athletes? Limiting the top salary possible for professional baseball players, as Steve suggests, in order to maintain the economic viability of the sport might show us a way to address health crises around the world. Tyrell also argues for limits, suggesting that the NCAA should reduce their profits by sharing more of the revenue from college athletic programs with the athletes themselves. Even though people have no means to choose their place of birth, you still have the right to make choices. Concerning how you spend your money, what limits will you consider? Christine Lee

Contents


Writers In This Category

Steven

Blendi

Tyrell Lynch

Changing America's Pastime Presently

Dear Commissioner Selig, I am writing to you as both a devoted, loving fan and concerned Major League Baseball follower. The great sport of baseball is nationally regarded as the quintessential American Past Time. The deep, historical rivals that exist are unmatched in virtually every other arena of competition. Stars of the past become heroes to fans of the present and names such as Babe Ruth and Jackie Robinson are associated with not just their profession, but the eras in which they flourished. Sandy Koufax and Roberto Clemente were public icons in their days because of excelling in athletics and in character. Today, however, stardom is equated with lavish lifestyles and celebrity status similar to rappers and rock stars. This notion is being propagated by the virtually limitless salaries that owners are paying for top-name players. Though the MLB has instituted a luxury tax for teams paying exorbitant amounts in payroll, it has done little to balance the talent distribution in the league today. As a result, dominant teams have become increasingly dominant, and subordinate teams have become increasingly hopeless. Via the institution of a salary cap, Major League Baseball has the ability to level the playing field of baseball. Teams like the New York Yankees and Boston Red Sox spend unbelievable amounts of money building all-star teams. They play in large, prosperous cities and accordingly generate incredible amounts of revenue from ticket sales, food sales, memorabilia and so on. According to ESPN, the New York Yankees spent $196 million dollars on its players for the 2007 season compared to just the Tampa Bay Devil Rays’ (who play in the AL East along with the Yankees) $25 million. No wonder they finished 30 games back from the Yankees this season while the Yankees spent the most money in the league, and correlatively made the playoffs, for the 13th straight season. Though records and streaks are inarguably an integral part of baseball’s allure, these clearly show the disparity that money can create. With postseason appearances comes exponential revenue growth and therefore more purchasing power on the player market. This vicious, self-propelled cycle is not one that will cease. It will continue to claim the fan base of underprivileged, poorly funded teams who repeatedly fail due to their lack of resources and talent. Obviously if teams are allowed to spend nearly unlimited dollars, salaries for superstars will grow dramatically. Alex Rodriguez is currently earning, largely because of the lack of salary regulation but also as a function of the status of our society, over $25 million per year, more than the president of the United States. Forgetting the social inequities this involves, it also creates issues in the great sport of baseball. The Texas Rangers were able to afford paying this massive contract by sacrificing quality at other positions. Of course, when the Yankees were struggling a few years ago they simply bought out his contract and added to their all-star lineup. “Perhaps 12 of 30 Major League teams have any possibility of reaching postseason play, and fewer still have a realistic hope of winning a pennant," Padres owner John Moores wrote in the Wall Street Journal, "Unless baseball changes the way it does business, it risks seeing its fans drift away, tired of their teams' futility."

Full Text of Steven's Paper

Making A Difference

Spinning the globe to the United States I find out that Aids/HIV used to be a terrifying death sentence, but now it's under control. Many people consider Aids/HIV in Africa a cause of global terrorism a time bomb and an unanswered moral challenge. “The Invisible People” Behrman lays out a harsh and frightening overview. He makes a warning that AIDS - "the greatest humanitarian catastrophe of our time" is also a national security threat to the USA. The AIDS epidemic is a time bomb because it can destabilize continents and destroy countries. (Behrman) These are all shocking words. AIDS is treatable, yet remains a death sentence for more thirty-seven million adults and more than 2 million children. To add to the despair, the numbers are expected to rise(Avert).

Full Text of Blendi's Paper

Pay for Play

In the wonderful world of sports there is an ongoing and steadfast argument of whether or not college athletes should receive pay for their play. These arguments are directed mostly toward basketball and football, being that both sports bring in most of the money into the National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). Some believe that the strenuous training regiments and athletic displays are deserving of some category of stipend. Others feel as though paying amateur athletes would corrupt what some people view as a pure and innocent state of affairs.

Full Text of Tyrell Lynch's Paper

Academics
Student Life
Food
Recreation
Campus
Local
fb Was this article useful? Please spread the word and share on Facebook!